Ok, so I’m not actually saying that this is what it looks like when those in governmental posts decide to get involved with the internet, but funny stuff no? Less funny when you consider the news that Governmental agency sites will be integrating OpenID so that you can link your Facebook/LJ/Twitter/Google accounts to join the great wide message board known as “The US Government.” Now, I’m not opposed to people getting more involved in their government. Quite the opposite really; in case anyone forgot, we are a republic, a government predicated on the notion that the people give a rat’s ass. That means that you are SUPPOSED to call or write your representatives when they do something silly or that seems wrong. They may ignore you, if they’re taking Burke’s advice, but at the very least you will be telling them your concerns and they’ll (hopefully) be taken into account when decisions are made. At the very least, you’ll be in on the action.
Enter Open Government Initiative, which attempts to get the MySpace/Facebook generation to actually interact with government agencies instead of bitching and moaning on the blogosphere about stuff they should have known, and could have, but didn’t because it isn’t in the Facebook feed. Sorry, but the laziness of my generation gets my goat. There are positives to it though: more agencies are starting blogs to document what it is they actually do, more agencies are utilizing Web 2.0 technologies to disseminate information in a variety of formats and ways, and more agencies are actually going to “teamwork” models for some of their everyday business needs. Now does it need to be all team based? Certainly not, this isn’t customer service or a production line. However, having some collaboration built into the existing agency structure will be helpful for inter-agency collaboration– you’re guaranteed to have someone on staff who knows how to work in that environment.
However, there is one issue I have with the Open Government Initiative: it’s not actually a program. There are a lot of people out there claiming that the Open Government Initiative is a disappointing program because no one seems to be doing anything to help facilitate the stated goals. There’s a reason for that: it’s a memo! There is no force of law, there is no force of anything– at this point it’s a wish list, a statement of intent, a “FYI, guys, this will happen someday!” I’ve never heard of anyone being bound by something that was sent to them as a “hey, here’s an idea I had” memo. Why is it different for government agencies? I grant you, there is nothing glamorous about offering an XML format for the Federal Register, nor is there anything over the top about offering a spate of new websites that help with accessing government data in a digital, easy to manipulate format. Nevertheless, there is potential for a lot of good here. There’s also the potential for a lot of frustration, and that comes from the fora portion of the program.
If you watched the little video I posted earlier in this entry, I imagine it’s starting to make some sense as to why it’s there. Quite simply, the web is a wild and wooly place, full of people that run that gamut of humankind. Mensa has a website, sure, but then there’s /b/ I don’t think I have to tell anyone that the promise of “open collaboration” will draw all kinds. I think it’s also worth mentioning that they almost had to shut down the Phase 1 Public Collaboration site for the Initiative because of the volume of off topic posts, many of them politically charged. That’s the glorious fun of the Internet, you know, the completely untamed stream of consciousness. But ‘that’s no basis for a system of government’ and I think this is one of those classic “early adopter” scenarios– this is new for government, and that means there will be issues, and I don’t think anyone has built that into their ideas about the Initiative and what it can do.